Suspicions mount against both Governments: Are Maithri and Putin bans a ploy ? Is there a warship camouflage ? (video)

Controversial Cabinet Media Briefing

(Lanka-e-News - 21.Dec.2017, 11.35PM)  Following the official announcement made regarding Sri Lanka’s (SL) Asbestos sheets ban and Russia’s tea ban  at the cabinet media briefing   on the 20 th , suspicions have arisen whether the two governments are seeking to conceal  vital  facts .

At the cabinet media meeting the following official announcement was made :

*On the 15 th of December , the Federal service of veterinary and  plant hygiene  service of the Russian government informed the consensual government ‘s  plant hygiene service of Sri Lanka that , because there  were live larvae of the ‘Capra’ insect in the containers of tea exported to Russia ,  the plantation products imported from SL is being proscribed from the 18 th .
 
*It is about 11 % of the total tea export of SL that is dispatched to  Russia .

*It is the standards laid down by the European union which SL follows when exporting Tea.
 
*According to the government , based on unofficial information received by it , this  ban imposed by  Russia is a sequel  to the decision taken by the SL  government on 2016-09-06  to  restrict the import of raw materials for use and the manufacture of asbestos sheets from 2018-01 -01,   because most of those raw materials are imported from Russia.
  
*Under these circumstances , the SL government suspended its decision to proscribe the import of asbestos materials(  from 2018-01-01) 

*In SL , it is asbestos which are used for 80 % of the roofing  .  Besides there are no other alternative products  so far .

*The ban on the asbestos that was to commence in January  2018 will not be implemented  all at once. That will be gradual. As a first step , the government will be halting the use of asbestos  and gradually it will  be completed  in 2024.

*The measures taken by the government hitherto to lift the tea ban … 

1.The ambassadors of the two countries have held discussions in this regard.
2.An official reply has been forwarded in response to the notification issued by  Russia. 
3.By 18 th December (night) president Sirisena has sent a personal letter to the Russian president ( the ministers who attended the media briefing did not know the contents of the letter) 
4.An official delegation  has not  been sent to Russia. The latter has given an appointment for discussion on the 27 th , and the SL delegation will  be leaving for Russia  on the 25 th or 26 th  .
5.The delegation led by the minister of science and technology Susil Premajayantha will be  leaving for Russia in January 2018 to discuss the situation pertaining to the asbestos imported from Russia.

The reasons to suspect that the government is concealing vital facts….

*This consignment of tea has been shipped to Russia by a private Co. If an issue crops up regarding the quality of the commodity of the  consignment received by a country  , what any country does is ,it halts the  cargo  from being unloaded , and the relevant Co.is warned. On the other hand if the lapse continues and the mistake is committed over and over again as though deliberately , then  that Co is blacklisted. Simply because there is an issue regarding the quality of the consignment of a Co.,  immediately action is not taken to halt the import of all related goods from the entire country that is exporting those. 

A case in point is : when the fuel imported by SL was below quality , what SL did was halting the unloading of the cargo . It did not ban the import of fuel from that country.

Based on that , the proscription imposed by Russia is not according to established norms.  
and  unreasonable, meaning that there must be other motives  behind this move.
Whether that motive is what the SL government is  trying to portray is the next pertinent question.

*Never before has Russia imposed such a ban officially on SL. Neither did SL take a decision any day that the import of asbestos from Russia shall be banned.  The decision taken was , the  government would  withdraw from the use of   asbestos , and that decision does not affect the private companies importing Russian asbestos products  because in SL where there is a 80 % use of asbestos , so far until an alternative is in sight  nobody has given thought to options.

For such a powerful large country like Russia , SL is just an infinitesimal entity.  Hence  for Russia’s asbestos export market SL is insignificant , and  is just a dispensable and disposable ‘appendix’ .

Therefore while the decision of SL to ban asbestos is a virtual failure , the statement that  Russia imposed the tea ban in that backdrop, is difficult to accept. This  Russian ban is something  strange and  new. 

*If the SL government is still saying Russia’s tea ban is a sequel to SL’s asbestos prohibition , then why wait until January to dispatch minister Susil Premajayantha to Russia? Is it because the SL government is aware the true reason for the tea ban is not the asbestos issue?

In this backdrop , the revelations made by Chandra Pradeep the Lanka e news reporter on 18 th merits a review. 
 
It is because the Rosonborono export Co. with which Maithri -Maharaja mahajara team tried to transact the sordid warship deal is a blacklisted Co. , SL  cannot push through that deal?
   
If the SL government still transacts the sordid deal , SL will have to face economic sanctions imposed by other countries except Russia. 

In other words it is to surmount this obstacle both parties have devised this ‘Tea ban and asbestos ban’  ploy to somehow fix the deal. Hence, suspicions mounting in this direction against both countries is most reasonable and understandable. Whether in the bags of Maithri and Putin there is truly  a warship or not  is also therefore questionable. 

No matter what , the revelations made by the government pertaining to the tea ban and asbestos prohibition at the cabinet media briefing on the 20 th in response to the questions posed by  journalists are in the video footage hereunder 

---------------------------
by     (2017-12-21 18:23:28)

We are unable to continue LeN without your kind donation.

Leave a Reply

The name of Ruth is?

  0 discussion on this news

News Categories

    Corruption

    Defence News

    Economy

    Ethnic Issue in Sri Lanka

    Features

    Fine Art

    General News

    Media Suppression

    more